"I think the idea of community run networks is complex, because if the operators of the networks have a bias, that bias will reflect on the network"
Sure, but my point is that *every* network has biases and that the only credible approach to reducing bias will always be one of consensus and dialogue between a variety of actors. Which a decentralized network is well set up to do, even if it hasn't materialized in practice yet, while a centralized network fundamentally can't do that.
> reducing bias will always be one of consensus and dialogue between a variety of actors
Did you read my original post? We took many actions over a period of nearly two years.
What additional actions should we (the victims) be burdened with?
Well, did you read my posts? Because I wasn't making any demands on you, was I?
I'm just saying what systems I believe are structurally capable of creating a minimized-bias environment and what aren't. But what a system is capable of and what it looks like in its current form can be two different things. So I wasn't in any way trying to minimize your (collective) experience or saying that you specifically didn't try hard enough.
